State Of Chhattisgarh And 02 ORS. v. Visheshar

BY NOTlFiCATlON N0. 9960/D-2S70/XX1B/C.Q./05 AS SPECIFIED IN SCHEDULE £&HOF THE COURT FEES ACT 1870.

IN THE mGHCOURT OF JUDICATUTRE AT BILASPUR

CHHATTISGARH Writ Petition (L) No.^L^_/2007.

'l.

State of Chhattisgarh, through the Superintending Engineer, Water Resources Division, Raipur (CG) Petitioners:

2.

Executive Engineer, Construction Division, Water Resources Division, Baloda Bazar, District Raipur (CG) ..^ ...:'''.A« 3.

Sub divisional Officer, Balar Canal Works, Water Resources Department, Sub Division, Kasdol, Tahsil Kasdol district Raipur (CG) .^$^%/"

^^;^~ '^\.--'

y Respondenti

Versus

-' Visheshar, S/o Sukhdeo Patel, resident of Pisid, Police Station Kasdol, District Raipur(CG).

WRIT _ _ PETITION UNDER ARTICLE OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

^.

NAFR ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR WPL N0,6423 of 2007 ^-^ • State Of Chhattisgarh, through the Superintending Engineer, Water Resources Division, Raipur.

•^B • Executive Engineer Construction Division Water Resources Division Baloda Bazar District Raipur CG • Sub Divisional Officer Balar Canal Works Water Resources Department Sub Division Kasdol Tahsit Kasdol District Raipur Cg - Petitioners

Versus

Visheshar, S/o. Sukhdeo Patel, resident of Pisid, Police Station Kasdol, District Raipur (CG) -- Respondent : Shri Vivek Sharma, G.A.

For Petitioners/State For Respondent : Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate.

Hon'bte Shd Jystice Pritinker Diwaker •» Order On Board 23/11/2016 Shri Deshmukh submits that after passing of the order by the Labour Court and Industrial Court, the respondent was reinstated and thereafter on 5.8.2013 he has expired and as such the petition has become infructuous. In view of above, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge suguna