Dinesh Kumar Chhedaiya v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 947 of 2018

1. Dinesh Kumar Chhedaiya S/o S/o Rameshwar Singh Chhedaiya Aged About 38 Years Presently Posted As Siksha Karmi Grade- I (Panchayat Lecturer) At Government High School Bholapur, Block Churiya, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. R/o Sita Baddi Churiya Ward No. 02, Chhuriya Kalan, Dongargaon, DistrictRajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

2. Kamleshwar Kumar Dewangan, W/o Ubhayram Dewangan Aged About 30 Years Posted As Siksha Karmi Grade-I, (Panchayat Lecturer) At Government High School Bholapur, Block- Churiya, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. R/o 211 Gendatola, BlockChuriya, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Commissioner- Cum- Director, Directorate Of Panchayat, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Excutive Officer, Zila Panchayat Kabirdham, DistrictRajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

4. Block Education Officer, Churiya, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :

Mr. Akash Pandey, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, PL ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order on Board 30/01/2018 1.

Learned counsel for the parties would submit that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by order dated 28.11.2017 passed by this Court in WPS No. 2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs.

State of Chhattisgarh and another) and batch of petitions wherein the circular dated 23.04.2016 has been quashed, petitions allowed and it has been declared that the petitioners therein shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post. 2.

In view of the aforesaid submission and the impugned order and action is based on circular dated 23.04.2016 which has been quashed in the case referred to herein above, the petition also deserves to be allowed with the direction that the petitioner shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by him on a lower post or on the same post. 3.

No order as to costs.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rohit