← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWP227/139/2017dismissed

Kavita Jaswani v. Laxman Kukreja

2018-11-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (227) No. 139 of 2017 1.

Kavita Jaswani, wife of Sunil Jaswani, aged about 39 years, 2.

Smt. Riya Jaswani, wife of Kamlesh Jaswani, aged about 37 years, Both resident of 325, Patankar Colony (Shadani), Nagar Sindhi Colony, P.S.- Durg, Civil & Revenue District - Durg (C.G.) ----Petitioners/defendants No. 1 & 2

Versus

1.

Laxman Kukreja, son of Shantilal Kukreja, aged about 41 years, 2.

Omprakash Kukreja, son of Shantilal Kukreja, aged about 51 years, 3.

Ram Kukreja, son of Shantilal Kukreja, aged about 41 years, 4.

Satish Kukreja, son of Shantilal Kukreja, aged about 38 years, Respondents No. 1 to 4 are resident of Sindhi Colony, Station Road, Durg, P.S. - Durg, Civil & Revenue District - Durg (C.G.) ---- Respondents/plaintiffs.

Writ Petition (227) No. 254 of 2017 1.

Sunil Jaswani, aged about 49 years, son of Trilok Chand Jaswai 2.

Kamlesh Jaswani, aged about 44 years, son of Trilok Chand Jaswani Both are resident of 325, Patankar Colony (Shadaninagar), Sindhi Colony, Durg, Tahsil & District- Durg (C.G.) ----Petitioners/Proposed Defendants

Versus

1.

Laxman Kukreja, son of Shantilal Kukreja, aged about 41 years, 2.

Omprakash Kukreja, son of Shantilal Kukreja, aged about 51 years, 3.

Ram Kukreja, son of Shantilal Kukreja, aged about 41 years, 4.

Satish Kukreja, son of Shantilal Kukreja, aged about 38 years, Respondents No. 1 to 4 are resident of Sindhi Colony, Station Road, Durg (C.G.) (Plaintiffs)

5.

Smt. Kavita Jaswani wife of Sunil Jaswani, aged about 39 yers, 6.

Smt. Riya Jaswani, wife of Kamlesh Jaswani, aged about 37 years, No. 5 & 6 are resident of 325 Patrakara Colony (Shadaniniagar), Sindhi Colony, Durg, Tahsil & District - Durg (C.G.) ........ Defendants ---- Respondents/plaintiffs. .

For Petitioner : Shri Vijay Kumar Sahu, Advocate. For Respondents : None Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 01/11/2018 (1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that he may be permitted to withdraw these writ petitions as the matter has been compromised between the parties. (2) Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-