Anil Dhruv v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 1102 of 2018 Anil Dhruv S/o Ramkhilawan Dhruv Aged About 23 Years R/o Nayapara, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station, Chakarbhatha, Tahsil And Revenue District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent MCRC No. 1565 of 2018 Manoj Kumar Kewat S/o Shri Mokhram Kewat Aged About 19 Years R/o Sirgitti Nayapara, Police Station Sirgitti, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Chakarbhata, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Respective Applicants : Mr. Rajkamal Singh & Mr. Ajay K. Dwivedi, Advocates For State : Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, PL ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order on Board 13/04/2018 1.

Both the bail applications are being disposed off by this common order as they arise out of the same crime number. 2.

The applicants have been arrested in connection with the same

Crime No. 527/2017 registered at Police Station - Chakarbhatha, Bilaspur (CG) for alleged commission of offences under Section 379 of IPC. 2.

The allegation against the applicant Anil Dhruv committed theft of mobile said to be of Rs. 21,000/-.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated. He further submits that investigation is complete and charge sheet has been filed, seizure has been prepared and he is not likely to abscond. Looking to the maximum punishment, at this stage, they may be granted bail.

4.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes bail application and submits that applicants are habitual offenders. Earlier, against applicants, offence under Section 394 Cr.P.C. has been registered, therefore, if they are granted bail ,they are likely to misuse this liberty therefore, application may be rejected.

5.

Having considered the submission of learned counsel for the parties and nature of allegations and that investigation is complete and charge sheet has been filed, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicants 6.

Accordingly, the applications are allowed. It is directed that the applicants shall be released on bail on each of them furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- along with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. They shall appear before the Trial Court regularly on each and every date, unless exempted from appearance.

Certified copy as per rules.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rohit