High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/745/2021disposed off

Smt. Manju Tiwari v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-02-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 745 of 2021

1. Smt. Manju Tiwari W/o Ravindra Tiwari, Aged About 37 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Government Buniyadi Primary School, Bhoghapara Shivrinarayan, Block Nawagarh, District Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. District Education Officer, Janjgir - Champa, District Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh

5. Block Education Officer, Nawagarh, District Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh.

6. Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat Shivrinarayan, District Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Govind Dewangan, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. Avinash Singh, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 19/02/2021

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the issue involved in the present writ petition has already been considered and decided by this Court in WP(S) No. 3088 of 2019, therefore, the same order may be passed in the present writ petition also.

2. This Court in WP(S) No. 3088 of 2019 on 07.02.2019 has passed the following order:-

1. The limited grievance of the petitioners is that they are entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which they have completed but they have not been given the same till date.

2. Given the limited grievance raised, let both the petitioners make detailed representation in this regard to respondents who in turn shall scrutinize the same and pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the field of Kramonnati. It is expected that an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioners.

3. With the aforesaid observation, writ petition stands disposed of.

3. Learned State counsel has no objection.

4. It is ordered accordingly. The ratio laid down in the case supra shall also govern the cause of lis in this case and will have the same effect and operation.

5. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Jyotijha