Narad And Another v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS

IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATI'ISGARH

AT BILASPUR 'lm «a (3 Writ Petition (C! N0.

"\'

\/\ \ [2014 PETITIONERS 1] Narad, S/o.

Jagdish, aged about years, R/o.

Nutan Chowk, Sarkanda, Police Station and Post Sarkanda, Civil and Revenue District Bilaspur (C.G.) Smt.

Nageshwari Dhruw, Wd/o.

Punararn Dhruw, aged about 43 years, R/o.

Nutan Chowk, Sarkanda, Police Station and Post Sarkanda, Civil and w W .

Revenue District Bilaspur (C.G.) W w..

VERSUS

RESPONDENTS 1] State of Chhattisgarh, Through:

Secretary, Urban Administration Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2] Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3] Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, through: its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4] Union of India, through;

Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Urban Property Alleviation, New Delhi, INDIA WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/2210F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

WW13fgQ'im %ei1°duan%¥i mmafiam S B Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra 182-2015 Shri Manoj Paranjape, A 'dvocate for the petitioner, Shri Arun '

Sao, Dy. Adv. General for the State and Ms. Pushpa Dwivedi, Adv.

fo'r the respondent Corporation.

bounsel pieads no instructions in the Shri Paranjape, learned matter.

No other counsel is appe iaring to press this writ petition in the circumstances, tt 'ere is no other option left with the tfor want of prosecution.

Court but to dismiss the petition betition is dismissed for want of the writ Accordingty, prosecution, SdlPrashant Kumar Mishra Judge