Preetpal Belchandan v. S.Prakash

INTHE KON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHH&TTISGAKH &T BIL&SPUR Contempt Case fCiviU No. 80 /2Q14 .^-.-.

(Arisina out ofW.P. (C) N0. 656 /2013^ -^ Preetpal Belchandan S/o Late Bhudar PETITIQNER Lal, aged about years, Ex- 'resident of Board of Director of ^ ^y ^^ .v\"1 District Cooperative Qentral Bank f Limited, Durg (C.G.), R/o village & Post- Tirga, P.S. Tirga, Tahsil Durg, Civil & Revenue District Durg (C.G.) <:'-".- Vi'"

VERSUS ,, RESPpNDENT Conteinnoi'

S. Prakash', Registrar,_ Chhattisgarh Cooperative^Suuiel^fgaipur (C.G.) 4^S=<.-C>€)a'

•a CONTEMPT PETITIONITNDER'ARTICLE 215 !OF THE CONSTI'fUTION OF INDI& 1950. RE2U) WrTH SECTIONIZ QFTHECONTEMPTOFTHECQURT&CT.

ti

XJ-HC-78 'g'sa •*ii*iiptAi, yTtt'M'iiis, Ridi'yii't ^^ HlNrtlsh^|cb.......CcnA:....8.o|(.^.....^2(M yi^l Wcb (lyT^^) ^I^Irt^-f Hl+fdT^fe^t •(RRSR ^iatfdnai^ sn^t^iiRi.iisb ^SBW^fSBSn^I cCTaii^Tgiwe S.B^HQN'BLEJVIRJUSTLCE^ANJAY ICAGRAWAL 07.05.2015 Shri Amrito Das, counsel Vpr the petitioner.

Dr. N.K. Shukla, Senior ^dvocate with Ms. Mukta Tripathi, counsel for the respondent.

Learnedcounsel for the j)arties submit'that as the original petition has already been dec ;ided and the present contempt petition has become infructuous.

In view of the submissioni made by learned counsel for the if'

i§' dismissed as having become parties, the contempt petition infruGtuous.

Sd/- Sanjay K. Agrawal Judge L