← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1414/2014withdrawn

Chhattisgarh Swasthya Malaria Karmachari Sangh And ANR. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2016-04-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1414 of 2014

1. Chhattisgarh Swasthya Malaria Karmachari Sangh Through President Pushkal Kumar Sahu, Office Address Street No. 3, Pandri Tarai, In Front Of Saraswati Dal Mill, Raipur C.G. Presently Working As Skilled Worker In District Hospital Dhamtari, C.G. and President Of Society Tah & Distt. Dhamtari P.S.

2. Deepak Shrivastava S/o Shri M.K. Shrivastava Aged About 34 Years Working as Semi Skilled Workers, MalariaDepartment & Posted At Directorate, Health Services, Purna Nursing Hostel District Raipur R/o Santoshi Chowk, Kushalpur, Raipur C.G. Tah and Distt. Raipur P.S.Prni Basti Raipur C.G.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Health Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

2. Commissioner, Health Services, Purna Nursing Hostel, Distt. Raipur C.G.

3. The Director, Health Services, Purna Nursing Hostel, Distt. Raipur C.G.

4. Chief Medical & Health Officer Raipur, C.G. ---- Respondent For Petitioners Shri N. K. Vyas, Advocate For Respondent/State Shri Shashank Thakur, GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 25/04/2016 1.

The members of the petitioners association were working as Field Worker in different health centres in the Department of Health and Family Welfare. By notice (Annexure-P-1), the Chief Medical and

Health Officer, Raipur has informed the members of the petitioners association that in view of the communication issued by the Department of Health Services, Raipur on 28.02.2013, their services shall remain discontinued after 31.03.2014.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the association has submitted representation before the State Government, therefore, he would not press this petition at this stage and would like to request the State Government to decide the representation. 3.

In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, however, the respondents are expected to decide the representation by a reasoned order within a period of 4 months from today. 4.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case.

Sd/- JUDGE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA Nirala