Smt. Mithilesh Pandey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1049 of 2018 Smt. Mithilesh Pandey W/o B R Pandey Aged About 45 Years A/a 45 Years , Presently Posted And Working As Upper Division Teacher Government Middle School Jute Mill Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of School Education Mahanadi Mantralaya Naya Raipur Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction, Chhattisgarh , Indrawati Bhawan Naya Raipur Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. District Educatoin Officer, Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

4. Principal , Government Higher Secondary School, Government Middle School Jute Mill Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For petitioner :

Mr. Anumesh Shrivastava, Advocate For State :

Mr. Majid Ali, Dy. GA ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order on Board 01/02/2018 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 4.7.2017, in the case of one Tilak Ram Patel, UDT, the Govt. has passed specific order that who have been appointed on compassionate basis will not be deprived of two advance increments even if they have been appointed after 16.6.1993. He submits that the petitioner's case is similarly situated as Tilak Ram Patel.

2.

After having gone through the order dated 4.7.2017, it is found that in the case of one Tilak Ram who was appointed on 27.9.1994 on compassionate

basis has been held entitled for two advance increments even though he was appointed after 16.6.1993, on the premise that the earlier circular for grant of two advance increments to those who have obtained D.Ed. at their own expenses would not apply in cases of compassionate appointment. Therefore, in these circumstances, the case of the petitioner deserves consideration. 3.

The petition is accordingly finally disposed off with a direction to the respondent authority to examine petitioner's case on parity and grant similar benefit to the petitioner as has been extended to one Tilak Ram Patel, within a period of three months.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rohit