Ashok Jagane v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 315 of 2018 Ashok Jagane S/o Heera Ram Jagane, Aged About 54 Years R/o Ward No. 13, Koundkera, Tahsil Rajim, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector Gariyaband, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh

3. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue)- Cum Prescribed Authority (Panchayat), Gariyaband, District Gariyaband Chhattigarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh

4. Tahsildar, Rajim, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh

5. Umesh Sahu, Presiding Officer, Tahsildar Rajim, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh

6. Tulas Ram S/o Bharat Sahu, R/o Panchs Of Village Panchayat Koundkera, Tahsil Rajim, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh

7. Narendra Chelak S/o Dhiraji Chelak, R/o Panchs Of Village Panchayat Koundkera, Tahsil Rajim, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh

8. Chetan Kurre S/o Thanu Ram Kurre, R/o Panchs Of Village Panchayat Koundkera, Tahsil Rajim, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh

9. Milau Ram S/o Preet Ram R/o Panchs Of Village Panchayat Koundkera, Tahsil Rajim, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Raghvendra Pradhan, Advocate.

For Respondents / State :

Mr. Arun Sao, Dy. Advocate General.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 05/02/18 1.

This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner challenging the order dated 24.08.2017 and 04.04.2016 (Annexure - P/1 and P/2 respectively) passed by respondent No. 2- Collector, Gariyaband. 2.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent - State would submit that the order of Collector is revisable before the Divisional Commissioner (R).

3.

Be that as it may, the petitioner would be at liberty to file a representation before the Divisional Commissioner(R) within a period of two weeks from today and, in turn, the said authority shall consider and decide the petitioner's representation expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from date of receipt of representation along with certified copy of this order after hearing the parties.

4.

With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka