← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhCONT/93/2018disposed off

Diwakar Singh v. Shri Siddharth Komal Singh Pardesi

2018-02-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CONT No. 93 of 2018

1. Diwakar Singh S/o R D Singh, Aged About 35 Years, President, MIG (DLX) 204, Phase Il, Kabir Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Santosh Kumar Dubey S/o Shri Hari Prasad Dubey, Aged About 40 Years, Secretary MIG (DLX) 226, Phase Il, Kabir Nagar, Raipur,, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Vinod Kumar Pandey S/o Ram Chandra Pandey, Aged About 38 Years, Member, MIG (DLX) 196, Phase Il, Kabir Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Ashutosh Kumar Yadav S/o Paras Nath Yadav, Aged About 35 Years, Member, MIG (DLX) 227, Phase Il, Kabir Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioners

Versus

1. Shri Siddharth Komal Singh Pardesi, Commissioner, Chhattisgarh State Housing Board, Paryavas Bhawan, Sector- 19, North Block, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Shri Poonam Agrawal, Executive Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Housing Board, Division No. 1 Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Shri Rajesh Dandaliya Assistant Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Housing Board, Division No. 1 Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Harsh Wardhan, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 12/02/18 Heard.

2.

This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioners herein, alleging non-compliance of this Court's order dated 03.10.2017 passed in W.P.(C)

No. 1610/2017.

3.

After hearing learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, I deem it appropriate to give one opportunity to the respondents/contemnors to ensure compliance of this Court's order dated 03.10.2017 passed by this Court. 4.

The petitioners may also make additional representation along with the copy of this order within ten days from today before the respondents and, in turn, the respondent authorities shall ensure the compliance of this Court's order dated 03.10.2017 in its letter and spirit expeditiously. 5.

With the aforesaid direction, the contempt case stands finally disposed of.

SD/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka