← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/654/2020disposed off

Rajendra Kumar Chauhan v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-01-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 654 of 2020 • Rajendra Kumar Chauhan S/o Shri P.R. Chauhan Aged About 56 Years Occupation- Service, Presently Posted As Assistant Registrar At Sant Gahira Guru University, Ambikapur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Department Of High Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. The Commissioner Directorate Of Higher Education, Indravati Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Neeraj Choubey, Advocate For Respondents/ State :

Ms. Akanksha Jain, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 30/01/2020 Heard.

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is serving as Assistant Registrar at Sant Gahira Guru University, Ambikapur and has sort for mutual transfer. It is contended that initially communication was made to the State, thereafter the Commissioner on enquiry found that the petitioner wherein seeks transfer i.e. at Pt. Ravi Shankar University, Raipur certain posts are vacant wherein the petitioner can be accommodated, therefore, after the enquiry was concluded again a proposal was filed by the petitioner and the proposal have been forwarded by Respondent No. 1 to Respondent No. 2 which is lying for decision, therefore the petitioner has filed an representation Annexure P-6

on 23.11.2019 and prays that the representation may be directed to be decided.

2. Considering the fact, that the recommendation of petitioner's transfer have already been forwarded which is lying at the end of Respondent No. 2. Considering the same, Respondent No. 2 is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P6) within a further period of 45 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to give another copy of the representation to the respective respondent.

3. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Jyoti