High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/356/2019disposed off

Lakshwantin Bai v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-02-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 356 of 2019 • Lakshwantin Bai W/o Sitaram Sahu Aged About 50 Years Ex - Surpanch Gram Panchayat Nawagaon Khurd R/o Village Nawagaon Khurd Janpad Panchayat Sahaspur Lohara District - Kabirdham.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector Kawardha, District - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh.

3. Sub Divisional OfÏcer, Kawardha, District - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive OfÏcer Janpad Panchayat Sahashpur Lohara, District - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh.

5. Parshottam S/o Paras Ram Thethwar Gram Panchayat Nawagaon Khurd Janpad Panchayat Sahaspur Lohara, District - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh.

6. Lilaram Patil S/o Devlal Patil Gram Panchayat Nawagaon Khurd Janpad Panchayat Sahaspur Lohara District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh

7. Jakir S/o Safrutdin Gram Panchayat Nawagaon Khurd Janpad Panchayat Sahaspur Lohara District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh

8. Nasir Mohmmd S/o Klam Gram Panchayat Nawagaon Khurd Janpad Panchayat Sahaspur Lohara District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh

9. Onkar S/o Lukan Sen Gram Panchayat Nawagaon Khurd Janpad Panchayat Sahaspur Lohara District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 10.Vajuel Khan S/o Sahmeer Khan Gram Panchayat Nawagaon Khurd Janpad Panchayat Sahaspur Lohara District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 11.Bisahu Gond S/o Lakhan Gond Gram Panchayat Nawagaon Khurd Janpad Panchayat Sahaspur Lohara District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent For Petitioners Mr. Ajit Singh, Advocate For Respondent /State Mr. Sudeep Verma, Dy. GA Order On Board By Hon 'ble Mr Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra 5/2/2019

1. Heard.

2. The impugned order passed under Section 40 of the CG Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 is appealable before the Collector.

3. Let the petitioner avail the alternative remedy within 30 days from today.

4. If the appeal is preferred, as aforesaid, the Collector shall do well to dispose of the same, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 3 months.

5. The writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Judge Shyna