Jeevan Lal Kuldeep v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.C.C. No.104 of 2020 • Jeevan Lal Kuldeep S/o Mukundi Kuldeep Aged About 64 Years Resident Of Pitiyajhar, Ward No. 12, Tahsil And District - Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Works Departmant, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Chief Engineer Public Works Department, Raipur Division, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Executive Engineer(E & M) Light Machinery Nalkup And Gate SubDivision No. 2, Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. The Sub-Divisional Officer Light Machinery Nalkup And Gate SubDivision No. 2, Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh

5. The Joint Director Treasury, Accounts And Pension, Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Pathak on behalf of Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate.

Mr. State/respondents : Mr. Sudeep Verma, Dy.G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order on Board 05-02-2020 Heard.

1. This revision petition has been brought praying for correction of the details of respondent No.1.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the details given of respondent No.01 have been erroneously shown as regarding the "Public Works Department" which should have been "Water Resources

-2Department", therefore, the order be passed for making such correction.

3. On perusal of the record of W.P.(S.) No.10827 of 2019, it is found that similar erroneous description is also given there of respondent No.1 in the interim petition. On perusal of the other documents present in the record, it is clear that it was the order of the Water Resources Department which was challenged before the Controlling Authority, Payment of Gratuity Act and Assistant Commissioner and being aggrieved by that order, the W.P.(S.) was filed. Therefore, not only the order impugned needs correction but also the cause title in the main petition needs to be amended.

4. Considering that this prayer is made for both the purposes that is for amending the cause title of the main petition and also for correction of the cause title in the impugned order, the petition is allowed and disposed off. The learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to amend the cause title of the W.P.(S.) No.10827 of 2019 with respect to the description given by respondent No.1 and at the same time, it is ordered that the description of respondent No.1 in the impugned order shall now be referred to as State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Water Resources Department, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur, DistrictRaipur, C.G.

5. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Monika Judge