Dr.Kamlesh Kumar Kewant And Other v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No.295 of 2018

1. Dr.Kamlesh Kumar Kewant Son of Shri Shyamlal Aged About 30 Years R/o Village and Post Pondishankar, Thana Bamhnidih, District JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh, District:Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

2. Dr. Gunjan Vishvakarma, Son of Shri Malikram Vishvakarma, Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Mundadeori, Thana Pathariya, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh

3. Dr. Akhilesh Singh Thakur, Shri Rajkumar Thakur, Aged About 35 Years R/o Village And Post Jauda, Thana Gobra Navapara, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Dr. Santosh Kumar Sahu, Shri Parmanand Sahu, Aged About 39 Years R/o Village Chhanta, Thana Gobra Nayapara, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

5. Dr. Preetam Lal Sahu, Shri Rajauram Sahu, Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Doma, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

6. Dr. Om Prakash Sahu, Shri Sevakram Sahu, Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Ugetra, Post Kathiya No. 2, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

7. Dr. Devanand Sahu, Shri Ghanaram Sahu, Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Palaud, Post Tekari, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

8. Dr. Gyanchand Sahu, Shri Purushottam Sahu, Aged About 47 Years R/o Village And Post And Thana And Tahsil Mainpur Khurd, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh

9. Dr. Ramesh Kumar Sahu, Shri Puranlal Sahu, Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Kolar, Abhanpur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 10.

Dr. Budhraj Sahu, Shri Narayan Sahu, Aged About 37 Years Village Bhothidih, Post Bhurka, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 11.

Dr. Yetram Sonwani, Shri Brijram Sonwani, Aged About 48 Years R/o Village Torla, Tahsil Abhanpur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 12.

Dr. Shivkumar Ahir, Late Shri Manharanlal, Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Muru, Thana Hirri, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Director, Health Services, Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Collector, Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Janjgir, District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

5. Collector, Office Of The Collector, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

6. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Mungeli, District Mungeli,

Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh

7. Collector, Office Of The Collector, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh

8. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Gariyaband, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh

9. Collector, Office Of The Collector, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh 10.

Chief Medical And Health Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 11.

Collector, Office Of The Collector, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr.Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate For Respondents :

Mr.Arun Sao, Dy.A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 2/2/2018

1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have made an application under the provisions of Chhattisgarh Rajya Upcharyagrah Tatha Rogopchar Sambandhi Sthapnaye Anugyapan Adhiniyam, 2013 (henceforth "Adhiniyam, 2013") for registration but the same has not been considered and decided till date and, therefore, they may be permitted to file fresh application for registration and the same may be directed to be decided expeditiously.

2. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the State would submit that the application filed by the petitioners for registration under Adhiniyam, 2013 has been decided.

3. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

4. Be that as it may, the petitioners are at liberty to file fresh application for registration under the Adhiniyam, 2013 and, in turn, the respondent authorities shall consider and decide the same expeditiously preferably within a period of

three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

5. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge B/-