← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1147/2018disposed off

Amrika Gupta v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-02-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1138 of 2018 Radheshyam Sahu S/o Late Shri Nathuram Sahu, Aged About 66 Years, R/o Tumgaon Road Mahasamund District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Agriculture And Sahakarita Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhavan Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Director, Agriculture And Sahakarita Mantralaya Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Marketing Federation Raipur, Through Its Managing Director, Ketala Bhawan Civil Line Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Raipur Through Its Managing Director Chaubay Colony G E Road Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

5. Branch Manager Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit , Raipur Chaubay Colony G.E. Road Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

6. Superintendant Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Raipur Chaubay Colony G.E Road Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

7. Registrar, Co - Operative Society , Floor - 3, Indrawati Bhawan Naya Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents WPS No. 1145 of 2018 Bharatgiri Goshwami, S/o Late Shri Pachkaud Giri Goshwami, aged about 66 years, R/o Nayapara, Mahasamund District Mahasamund (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Agriculture And Sahakarita Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhavan Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Director, Agriculture And Sahakarita Mantralaya Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Marketing Federation Raipur, Through Its

Managing Director, Ketala Bhawan Civil Line Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Raipur Through Its Managing Director Chaubay Colony G E Road Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

5. Branch Manager Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit , Raipur Chaubay Colony G.E. Road Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

6. Superintendant Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Raipur Chaubay Colony G.E Road Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

7. Registrar, Co - Operative Society , Floor - 3, Indrawati Bhawan Naya Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents And WPS No. 1147 of 2018 Amrika Gupta, W/o Late Shri Ramkrishna Gupta, aged about 56 years, R/o Subhash Nagar Mahasamund, District Mahasamund, C.G. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Agriculture And Sahakarita Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhavan Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Director, Agriculture And Sahakarita Mantralaya Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Marketing Federation Raipur, Through Its Managing Director, Ketala Bhawan Civil Line Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Raipur Through Its Managing Director Chaubay Colony G E Road Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

5. Branch Manager Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit , Raipur Chaubay Colony G.E. Road Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

6. Superintendant Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Raipur Chaubay Colony G.E Road Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

7. Registrar, Co - Operative Society , Floor - 3, Indrawati Bhawan Naya Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents

For Petitioners :

Ms. Ruchi Nagar, Advocate.

For Respondents :

Mr. S. C. Verma, Advocate.

For State :

Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 05/02/18 1.

The petitioners have filed this writ petition challenging the order of recovery passed by the Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank, Raipur. 2.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners would submit that petitioners may be allowed to make representation before the respondent Bank for redressal of their grievances. 3.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 4.

The prayer appears to be fair and reasonable and is accordingly allowed.

5.

Be that as it may, the petitioners would be at liberty to make representation before the respondent Bank and, in that event, the respondent - Bank shall consider and decide the petitioners' representation on its own merits within a period of one month from the date of receipt of representation and pass a reasoned order after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioners.

6.

With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka