Hem Kumar Gadatiya Ratnesh v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Others

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 5913 of 2008

1. Hemkumar Gadatiya (Ratnesh) S/o Govind Gadatiya, aged about 42 years Constable Posted At G.R.P. Champa, Present R/o Railway Colony Champa, Distt.-Janjgir-Champa (Cg) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Home and Police Affairs, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG)

2. Director General Of Police State Of Chhattisgarh, Police Head Quarter, Raipur (Cg)

3. Additional D.G.P. (Railway) Chhattisgarh, Police Head Quarter, Raipur (Cg)

4. DIG (Railway), Police Headquarter, Raipur (CG).

5. Superintendent Of Police (Railway) Chhattisgarh, Raipur (Cg)

6. Station Officer G.R.P. Railway Bilaspur, Distt.-Bilaspur (Cg)

7. Tejeshwar Prasad Shukla, Constable No.414, Posted at GRP Champa (there in) presently working as Head Constable, GRP, Thana, Bilaspur (CG).

---- Respondent For Petitioner None For Respondent/State Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 24/04/2017 1.

Perused.

2.

Petitioner, a Constable in the Department of Home/Police, is seeking a direction to the respondents to consider his case for promotion to the post of Head Constable.

3.

Learned counsel appearing for the State would submit that the petitioner's case was duly considered by the concerned selection committee/DPC out of turn for promotion to the post of Head Constable, however, on the basis of his service record, the petitioner was not found suitable for promotion, therefore, he has not been offered appointment on the post of Head Constable. 4.

Considering the fact that the case of the petitioner has already been considered for promotion, but was not found fit, no case for interference is made out.

5.

In the result, the writ petition, sans merit, is liable to be and is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs.

Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Gowri