← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1093/2018disposed off

Uttar Kumar Pradhan v. The State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-02-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1093 of 2018 Uttar Kumar Pradhan S/o Shri Jagdish Pradhan, Aged About 48 Years, Occupation Service, Posted As Secretary At Gram Panchayat Jagdishpur, Thana, Basna, Tahsil Pithoura, Civil And Revenue District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Collector Mahasamund, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

3. Chief Executive Officer, District Panchayat Mahasamund, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Pithoura, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Sunil Sahu, Advocate.

For Respondents / State :

Mr. Avinash Singh, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 02/02/18 1.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner would submit that petitioner has been placed under suspension since 26.09.2016 and even after lapse of 1 year and 4 months his suspension order has not been revoked by the respondent authorities and, therefore, he may be allowed to prefer a representation before the competent authority for redressal of his grievance.

2.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

3.

The prayer appears to be fair and reasonable and is accordingly allowed.

4.

Be that as it may, petitioner is at liberty to make a representation before the competent authority for revocation of his suspension order and if such a representation is preferred by the petitioner within 15 days from today along with copy of this order then, the competent authority shall do well to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation expeditiously preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of representation along with certified copy of this order. 5.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka