Ganeshwar Mandavi v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 710 of 2019 Rajkumar Kaushik S/o Late Ramji Kaushik, Aged About 44 Years, Working As Lecturer (Panchayat), At Govt. Higher Secondary School Makdi, Block Makdi, District Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Kondagaon, District Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh.
---Respondents WPS No. 711 of 2019 Ganeshwar Mandavi S/o Leda Ram, Aged About 41 Years, Working As Lecturer (Panchayat), At Govt. Higher Secondary School Esalnar, Block Kondagaon, District Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh.
---Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Kondagaon, District Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh.
---Respondents For petitioners :
Shri Mayank Chandrakar, Advocate.
For State :
Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 04/02/2019 1.
The instant Writ Petitions have been filed by the petitioners aggrieved of the inaction on part of the respondents in not confirming the services of the
petitioners though they have been appointed and working with the respondents since 2011 onwards.
2.
According to the counsel for the petitioners, under the rules governing the field, the confirmation could not have been extended beyond the period of 5 years which in the present cases also has been completed long back. He further submits that, till date, there is no order passed by the respondents so far as the claim of the petitioners are concerned, either entitling them or dis-entitling them from the benefits.
3.
Given the aforesaid submissions made by the counsel for the petitioners, this Court is of the opinion that, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the Writ Petitions pending, rather ends of justice would meet if the Writ Petitions are dispose off with a direction to the respondent No.2 to take a decision so far as the claim of the petitioners for confirmation are concerned.
4.
Let this exercise be done within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
5.
Both the Writ Petitions accordingly stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Sumit JUDGE