Surendra Kumar Garhewal v. National Highway Authority Of India Ltd.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 342 of 2019

1. Surendra Kumar Garhewal S/o Manharan Lal Garhewal Aged About 36 Years

2. Sunil Kumar Garhewal S/o Manharan Lal Garhewal Aged About 38 Years

3. Anil Kumar Garhewal S/o Manharan Lal Garhewal Aged About 42 Years

4. Manish Kumar Garhewal S/o Manharan Lal Garhewal Aged About 33 Years All are R/o Village Nirtu, Tahsil Takhatpur, P.S. Koni, DistrictBilaspur, Chhattisgrah., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. National Highway Authority Of India Ltd. Through Project Director, Bilaspur Unit, Abhilasha Parisar, New Bus Stand, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Bilaspur, DistrictBilaspur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Land Acquisition Officer-Cum-Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Bilaspur, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent For Petitioner Mr. Naveen Yadav, Advocate For Respective Respondents Mr. B. Gopakumar, Assistant Solicitor General and Mr. Sanjay Agrawal, Government Advocate Order On Board By Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra 5/2/2019

1. Heard.

2. In the present petition, it is contended that though the land of the petitioners was acquired and the compensation was paid, but the rehabilitation grant on the basis of the Notification dated 4.1.2017, which was published in an extraordinary Gazette of Chhattisgarh, has not been given. It is further contended that the petitioners have made necessary representation to the concerned authorities, therefore, the authorities may be directed to decide the representation.

3. Without entering into the merits of the case, considering the limited prayer, it is directed that if the petitioners make a fresh representation before respondent No.2, respondent No.2 may decide the same objectively within a period of 3 months.

4. The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- ( Prashant Kumar Mishra) Judge Shyna