Sanyukta Cement Majdoor Sangh And ANR. v. Industrial Court Chhattisgarh And ORS.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (L) No. 6207 of 2008 1.

Sanyukta Cement Majdoor Sangh (AITUC) a registered Trade Union vide registration No. 154, through its General Secretary, Purani Basti, Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir-Champa, Chattisgarh.

2.

Jila Cement Majdoor Sangh (BMS) registration No. 5195, through its General Secretary, CCI Colony, Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ----Petitioners

Versus

1.

Industrial Court, Chhattisgarh, Bench- Bilaspur, at Jarhabhata, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

2.

Labour Court established under C.G.I.R. Act, 1960 at Jarhabhata, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

3.

Cement Corporation of India, Company Secretary, SCOPE Complex, 7 Lodhi Road, New Delhi, through General Manager, CCI, Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

4.

General Manager, Cement Corporation of India (CCI), Akaltara, Distt. JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh. 5.

Union of India, Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprise, through the Secretary, Department of Heavy Industries, Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi. 6.

State Government of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Udyog Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 7.

Secretary, Labour Department, State of Chhattisgarh, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

8.

Chairman and Managing Director, Industrial Finance Corporation of India, IFCI Tower, RFD, 61, Nehru Place, New Delhi.

9.

Secretary, Ministry of Labour and Employment, Govt. of India, New Delhi. 10.

General Secretary, Rastriya Cement Avam Khadan- Shramik Sangathan, P.O. Akaltara Cement Factory, Distt. Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 11.

Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR), 22nd Floor, Jawahar Vyhapar Bhawan, Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi -110001 ---- Respondents.

For Petitioner : None For Respondents No. 3 & 4 : Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate. For Respondent No. 5 : Shri Krishna Gopal Yadav, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 13/08/2018 1.

Shri Vinod Deshmukh, learned counsel for respondents No. 3 & 4/CCI submits that after filing of this writ petition, original application, which was filed by the Union, has been dismissed by the Labour Court, as such no cause of action survives for consideration.

2.

In view of the submissions made by counsel for respondents No. 3 & 4/CCI, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-