Puranlal Kothari v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

W.P.(C)No.

L/'

/2015 Puranlal Kothari S/o Ghasiram Kothari Aged aboutyears, Resident of VillageSonaidongari, Gram-Panchayat-Sonaidongari, ........^ ^- ".Wi^^'q^--1"

Tahsil-Gumr, District- Balod ( C.G.) y<6s 'i^- State of Chhattisgarh Through its Secretary Panchayat & Rural Development department Mahanadi Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2) District Election Officer district -Balod ( C.G.) The Retuming Officer Gurur district-Balod ( C.G.) The ChiefExeGutive Officer Janpad Panchayat- Gurur dist. Balod ( C.G.) 5) Dularu Ram Sahu S/o Dasam Ram Sahu resident ofvillage- Sonaidongari, Gram-PanchayatSonaidongari, Janpad-Panchayat & Tahsil- Gurur, district- Balod (C.G.)

@ WMT PETITION UNDER AURTICLE 226 OF THE ^-

\y HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR W.P.(ClNo. 197 of 2015 PETITIONER Puranlal Kothari

Versus

State of Chhattisgarh & others RESPONDENTS Shri B.L. Sahu, counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Siddharth Rathore, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. SINGLE BENCH :

HON'BLE SHRI PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA. J.

ORAL ORDER (09/02/2015) \ This writ petition has been preferred challenging improper acceptance of nomination paper filed by respondent No. 5 for contesting electjon of office of the Sarpanch EifiQraF'n^Panchayat, Sonaidongari, Tahsil Gurur, District Balod.

2.

In view of the bar contained under Article 243-0 of the Constitution of India, this writ petition is not maintainable. Petitioner's remedy lies in filing an election petition under Section 122 of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993.

3.

Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable. Judge