High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/895/2021disposed off

Rajkumar Kurrey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-03-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 895 of 2021

1. Rajkumar Kurrey S/o Motilal Kurrey Aged About 49 Years OccupationTeacher, (L.B.), Government Middle School, Khadoudakhurd, VillageKhadoudakhurd, Thana- Pipariya, Visaskhand- Kawardha, DistrictKabirdham, Chhattisgarh.

2. Rambilas Portey S/o Johanram Portey Aged About 52 Years OccupationTeacher (L.B.), Government Middle School, Khairvar, R/o Village- Khairvar, Thana- Pipariya, Block- Kawardha, District- Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh.

3. Rajendra Kumar Diwakar S/o Shri Kejaha Ram Diwakar Aged About 44 Years Occupation- Teacher (L.B.), Government Middle School, Doukabandha, R/o Village- Doukabandha, Thana- Pipariya, BlockKawardha, District- Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh.

4. Jyotish Kumar Diwakar S/o Shri Dukaluram Diwakar Aged About 47 Years Occupation- Teacher (L.B.), Government Middle School, Khairvar, R/o Village- Khairvar, Block- Kawardha, District- Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Secretary, School Siksha Vibhag, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Secretary Panchayat, Gramin Vikash Avam Shram Vibhag, Mantralaya Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Mukhya Karyapalan Adhikari Janpad Panchayat, Kawardha, DistrictKabirdham, Chhattisgarh., District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh

4. District Education Officer Kabirdham, District- Kabirdham Chhattisgarh.

5. Khand Siksha Adhikari Vikaskhand, Kawardha, District- Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh., District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For Petitioners :

Shri Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate.

For Respondent State :

Shri Vivek Ranjan Tiwari, Addl. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 03.03.2021

1. The limited grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner is entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which the petitioner has completed but have not been given the same till date.

2. Given the limited grievance raised, let the petitioner make a detailed representation in this regard to respondents 3 & 4 who in turn shall scrutinize the same and pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the field of Kramonnati. It is expected that an appropriate order

-2shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioner.

3. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder