Bisen Kumar Dhurandhar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1591 of 2018 Bisen Kumar Dhurandhar S/o Late Shri Kejuram Dhurandhar, Aged About 66 Years R/o Kharora, Tahsil Tilda, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Agriculture And Sahakarita Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director Agriculture And Sahakarita Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chhattisgarh State Co Operative Marketing Federation Raipur Through Its Managing Director, Ketala Bhawan Civil Line, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Raipur Through Its Managing Director Chaubay Colony, G.E. Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

5. Branch Manager, Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Raipur, Chaubey Colony, G.E. Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

6. Superintendant Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Raipur Chaubay Colony G.E. Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

7. Registrar, Co Operative Society, Floor Iii, Indrawati Bhawan Naya Raipur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Faisal Akhtar, Advocate.

For Respondents/ State :

Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 19/02/18 1.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the order of

recovery passed by the Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank, Raipur. 2.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner would submit that petitioner may be allowed to make representation before the respondent Bank for redressal of his grievances.

3.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 4.

The prayer appears to be fair and reasonable and is accordingly allowed.

5.

Be that as it may, the petitioner would be at liberty to make representation before the respondent Bank and, in that event, the respondent - Bank shall consider and decide the petitioner's representation on its own merits within a period of one month from the date of receipt of representation and pass a reasoned order after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

6.

With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka