← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/12/2016disposed off

Ramsushil Pandey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-01-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.12 of 2016 Ramsushil Pandey, S/o Shri Samaylal Pandey, aged about 45 years, Panchayat Secretary, R/o Village Ranai, Police Station Patna, Tahsil Baikunthpur, District Koriya.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur.

2.

The Chief Executive Officer, District Panchayat Baikunthpur, District Koriya.

3.

The Collector, District Koriya (CG).

4.

The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Baikunthpur, District Koriya.

5.

The General Administration Committee, through the President, Janpad Panchayat, Baikunthpur, District Koriya. --- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Ashok Kumar Shukla, Advocate For Respondents : Shri Dhiraj Wankhede, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 07/01/2016 (1) Heard.

(2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a victim of frequent transfer as he has been transferred for five times within few months in different village Panchayat while working as Panchayat Secretary and, therefore, he may be permitted

to make a representation before respondent No.3 i.e. Collector, Koriya, for redressal of his grievances and the same may be directed to be decided expeditiously.

(3) Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.

(4) The petitioner is permitted to make a representation before respondent No.3 i.e. Collector, Koriya. If such representation is made by the petitioner before respondent No.3 within ten days from today, the said authority shall decide the same on its own merit and in accordance with law preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioner. (5) For a period of 40 days, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner with regard to the subject matter. (6) With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-