Pankaj Kumar Soni v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

-lt~ €P INTHE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGABH AT BILASPUR Writ Auueal No. ^ 5 /2Q 15 'Parikaj Kumar Soni son of Shri Khetinath Soni, aged about 37 years, resident of Kayasth Para, Thethwarpara, ward No. 6, Durg, P.S.

APPELLANT PETITIONER \\€'

^ & District Durg (C.G.) ^0^^^'^ ^w^^1^

VERSUS

State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Technical Education Department, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS 1.

2^' Director, Technical Education . Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) , Principal, Government Polytechnic, Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2(1) OF CHHATTISGAKH HIGH COURT (APPEAL TO DIVISION BENCffi ACT. 2006 fe R/W RULE 1S7

(1) OF CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT RULES. 2005.

JC^ ^ .' •^T"h\- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI NAVIN SINHA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE & HON'BLE SHRI PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, J.

WritADpeal No. 55 of 2015 APPELLANT :

Pankaj Kumar Soni.

PETITIONER

VERSUS

RESPONDENTS :

State of Chhattisgarh & Others.

WRITAPPEAL UNDER SECTION 2(1) OF THE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT (APPEAL TO DIVISION BENCH) ACT. 2006 R/W RULE 157(11 OF CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT RULES. 2005.

Appearance: NgnelpFtheAppellant.

^Shi-tYjRocl Deshmukh, Deputy Government Advocate fbr 'S';';tK&;State."

.

:

;'; :"

;: 's:W:v'W .-

ORDER

(13lhofFebruary,2015) Per Navin Sinha. Aca. C.J.

1. No one appeared on behalf of the Appellant in the pre-lunch session when we syo-motu passed over the matter. No one appears fbr theAppellant in the post-lunch session also.

2. Counsel for the Respondents is present.

3. The appeal which also appears to be barred by 261 days delay, is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/- ^ | sd//- ActingChiefJustice prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Amit