Shri Bhagwan Sharma v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5658 of 2009 G.P. Pandey, S/o Shri Ram Narayan Pandey, Aged about 53 years, Presently Working as Incharge Executive Engineer (Civil), Water Resources Department, Surajpur, Distt. Surguja, Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Water Resources Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. Engineer-in-Chief, Water Resources Department, Sihawa Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
3. State of Madhya Pradesh, Through Secretary Water Resources Department, Mantralaya, Bhopal.
--- Respondents WPS No. 5046 of 2009 Shri Bhagwan Sharma, S/o Late Shri S.R. Sharma, Aged about 56 years, Presently Working as Incharge Executive Engineer, Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana, North Kanker, Distt. Kanker, Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Water Resources Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. Engineer-in-Chief, Water Resources Department, Sihawa Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
3. State of Madhya Pradesh, Through Secretary Water Resources Department, Mantralaya, Bhopal.
4. Union of India, through Personal Grievances and Pension Department, New Delhi.
--- Respondents WPS No. 5047 of 2009 L.N. Tyagi, S/o Shri J.R. Tyagi, Aged 56 years, Presently Working as Sub Divisional Officer, Water Resources Department, Sub Division, Ramanujganj, Distt. Surguja, Chhattisgarh.
---Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Water Resources Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. Engineer-in-Chief, Water Resources Department, Sihawa Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
3. State of Madhya Pradesh, Through Secretary Water Resources Department, Mantralaya, Bhopal.
--- Respondents For Petitioners :- Mr. Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate For State :- Mr. Ravi Bhagat, Dy. G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board (Through Video Conferencing)
29/06/2021
1. At the outset, Mr. Vinod Deshmukh, learned counsel for all the three petitioners, would submit the he has no instructions from the petitioners.
2. Accordingly, all the three writ petitions stand dismissed as the petitioners' counsel has no instructions from the petitioners. No cost(s). Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Harneet