Aditya Kumar Soni @ Sani v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.Cr.C. No. 1014 of 2018 • Aditya Kumar Soni @ Sani S/o Late Mohan Prasad Soni Aged About 28 Years R/o New Khursipar, Bangali Colony, Indira Chowk, Near Hanuman Mandire, Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant
Versus
• State Of Chhattisgarh Through The District Magistrate Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent For the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Bhagat, Advocate.
For the Respondent/State :
Shri Anil S. Pandey, GA.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order on Board 12.04.2018
1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.261/2017, registered at Police Station- Khursipar, District -Durg, (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 420 of Indian Penal Code.
2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. This applicant is in jail since 14.10.2017, he is a local resident of District - Durg and ready to abide by all the conditions which may be imposed while
granting bail to the applicant, hence, it is prayed that the applicant may be released on bail.
3. Learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application and the submission made in this respect
4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused all the documents placed on record and the case diary.
5. The allegation against this applicant that he induced the complainant and also others that he is capable to arrange for appointment in job for the son of the complainant, for which the complainant shall be required to pay an amount of 06 Lakhs and on that inducement the complainant has paid the said amount, but job could not be procured for her son. On demand of refund made by complainant, the said amount was not refunded. Hence, the FIR was lodged.
6. Considered on the submission and contents of the case diary, the applicant is in detention since some quite time, after filing of the charge-sheet no purpose would be served, if the, applicant is kept in detention, till the completion of the trial, hence, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case, where the applicant is entitled for grant of bail.
7. Accordingly, the application for grant of bail is allowed. It is directed that the applicant shall be released on his furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of concerned trial court for his appearance as and when directed.
Sd /- (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge Jamal