Chait Ram Yadav v. The State Of C.G.And ORS.
J ^^/^'^Q^ c
IN THE H3UNRABLE CHHATTISQARH HXQH COURT OF JUDICATURE
AT_BIIASPUR.
W.P.NO. T"'75 2-72004 PES'ITIQNER (^ _-^..*'^.;"
^8'
.y^ .'^"
^° ^•t ^ 'l ^sy Ctiaifc Ram Yadav S/o chain sxngh aged about 55 years, Residence of village Newsa Tahsil Kofca Disfct.Bilaspur (C.G.) Presently MDrKiag at Wafcer resorce d^artmoit Kofea Distt. Bilaspur.
i,
VERSUS
RBSPOMDENTS
1) state of chhattis garh; through its principal Secratary.water resouree d^artmenfc Mantralaya Raipur (CoG.).
2) Sub-DivJLsional Officer^ Ghongha Sirsh Karya Up sanbhagh Kota Distt. Bilaspur (c«G») 3) Executive mgineer^ i?ater resource division^ Kota Distto Bilaspur (c»Q«)e o WRIT PETITIOM UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIOM OF 1_.-.^..._...._..._..
2NDXA.
.'\ 3o .'1 "-K'v^- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR S.B.:
HON'BLE SHRI NAVIN SINHA. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE WRIT PETITION N0. 1752 OF 2004 PETITIONER Chait Ram Yadav
Versus
RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh and others (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 ©RTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) ADDearance:
MwM\rz.a Kesar Beg, Advocate forthe Petitioner. BRDER (24th December, 2014) 1.
Learned Counsel forthe Petitioner submits that the petition has become infructuous.
2.
The application isdisposed as infructuous.
Sd/- Ag. Chief Justice Anu