High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1289/2018disposed off

Jyoti Dhruw v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-08-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 1289 of 2018 Jyoti Dhruw D/o Shri Shiv Prasad Dhruw, aged about 29 years, Aged About 29 Years, Presently Working As Lecturer Panchayat At Govt. High School, Somnapur Naya, Block Pandariya, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Commissioner Cum Director, Directorate Of Panchayat, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Kabirdham, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh

4. Block Education Officer, Pandariya, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh ----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate For State :

Mr. S. P. Kale, Dy. A. G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 27/08/2018

1. The Petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the Respondents, whereby the increment granted to the Petitioner is being withdrawn on the ground that she has not passed B.Ed/D. Ed examination.

2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the issue with regard to withdrawal/non-grant of increment on the ground of having not passed B.Ed/D.Ed examination was examined by this Court in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle v. State of Chhattisgarh (WPS

No.4271 of 2017 and batch of petitions vide order dated 03.11.2017) and various directions have been issued for affording proper opportunity of hearing and then decide the matter.

3. Learned Counsel for the State submits that the Petitioner's claim would be examined after affording opportunity of hearing in terms of order dated 03.11.2017 passed in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle (supra).

4. Considering the aforesaid submission, this petition is finally disposed of with a direction to the Respondents for examination of Petitioner's claim in terms of order passed by this Court in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle (supra) and to take appropriate decision thereon.

5. The writ petition stands accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Bhola