Santosh Kumar Janghel v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 905 of 2013 • Bedram Sahu S/o Madan Singh Sahu Aged About 31 Years R/o Village Kamandob, Tahsil Sahaspur Lohara, District Kabirdham C.G. (wrongly mentioned as District Rajnandgaon in order passed in WPS No.4476/2010) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary Panchayat & Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur C.G.

2. Jila Panchayat Kabirdham Through The Chief Executive OfÏcer, Kabirdham C.G.

3. Janpad Panchayat Sahaspur Lohara Through The Chief Executive OfÏcer, District Rajnandgaon C.G.

---- Respondent And WPS No. 906 of 2013 • Santosh Kumar Janghel S/o Shri Itwari Am Janghel, aged about 41 years, R/o Village Singhanpuri, P.S. Lohara, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary Panchayat & Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur C.G.

2. Jila Panchayat Kabirdham Through The Chief Executive OfÏcer, Kabirdham C.G.

3. Janpad Panchayat Sahaspur Lohara Through The Chief Executive OfÏcer, District Kabirdham (C.G.) ---- Respondent For Petitioners Mr. Rakesh Pandey, Advocate For Respondent /State Mr. Bhaskar Pyasi, Panel Lawyer For respondent No.2 Mr. Sushil Dubey, Advocate For respondent No.3 Mr. Pawan Shrivastava, Advocate

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 12/10/2015 Heard.

(2) The petitioners are aggrieved by the orders passed by the Zila Panchayat, Kabirdham.

(3) The aforesaid orders are appealable under Section 91 of the Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam , 1993 read with Chhatisgarh Panchayats (Appeal and Revision) Rules, 1995 (4) In view of availability of alternative remedy, the writs petitions are dismissed, as not maintainable.

However, liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioners to prefer appeal in accordance with law. Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Shyna