Satish Kumar Dewangan v. Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Ltd Cspdcl

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 43 OF 2016 Satish Kumar Dewangan S/o Late Bodhram Dewangan aged about 34 years R/o Kosta Para Raigarh Civil/Revenue District Raigarh (C.G.) ---Petitioner

Versus

1. Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Ltd. (CSPDCL) through its Chairman Regd Office at Energy Info Tech Centre Daganiya Raipur

2. Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Ltd. through its Director General Manager (HRD) Regd Office at Energy Info Tech Centre Daganiya Raipur ---Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. H.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Syed Majid Ali, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board /01/2016 1.

Learned counsel for the parties would jointly submit that this case is squarely covered by the decision rendered by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No.360/2015

(Raja Ram Kosle v. Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Ltd.) decided on 08/04/2015, in which, this Court has held as under:- "9. For the foregoing, the present batch of writ petitions is disposed of in the following manner:- • The petitioners shall submit fresh representations within a period of one month, along with copies of the earlier applications filed by each of them and supporting documents before the Manager, HRD, Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Limited, Dangania, District Raipur.

• On such representations being filed, the respondents shall decide the same strictly in accordance with the policy dated 30.1.1997.

• It is made clear that while deciding the representations, the respondents would be at liberty to take into consideration the law laid down by the Supreme Court in various decisions as also the law laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in WA No.588/2013.

10. However, it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondents shall decide the

representations in accordance with the policy dated 30.1.1997 and the principles governing grant of compassionate appointment laid down by the Supreme Court and the Division Bench of this Court and nothing contained in this order shall be construed as any opinion on merits in favour of the petitioners."

2.

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of paragraph-9 of the order dated 08/04/2015 passed in Writ Petition (S) No.360/2015 (Raja Ram Kosle v. Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Ltd.). Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE Tiwari