High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1362/2018disposed off

Ku. Kiran Janghel v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-02-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1362 of 2018 Ku. Kiran Janghel D/o Shri Jugeshwar Prasad Janghel, Aged About 31 Years Posted As Lecturer (Panchayat) Government High School Bhalpahari, Block Bodla, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh., District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Commissioner Cum Director, Panchayat And Social Welfare, Directorate Of Panchayat, 36 C Iii, Block Ii, Second Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Kabirdham, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh., District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh

4. Block Education Officer, Bodla, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh., District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Shikhar Shamra, Advocate For State :

Shri A.S. Kachhawaha, Addl. A.G.

S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 26/02/2018 Heard.

1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondents, whereby the increment granted to the petitioner is being withdrawn on the ground that she has not passed B. Ed/D. Ed examination.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the issue with regard to withdrawal/non-grant of increment on the ground of having not passed

-2B.Ed/D.Ed examination was examined by this Court in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle vs. State of Chhattisgarh (WPS No.4271 of 2017 and batch of petitions, vide order dated 03-11-2017) and various directions have been issued for affording proper opportunity of hearing and then decide the matter.

3. Learned State counsel would submit that the petitioner's claim would be examined after affording opportunity of hearing in terms of order dated 03-11-2017 passed in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle (supra).

4. Considering the aforesaid submission, this petition is finally disposed off with a direction to the respondents for examination of petitioner's claim in terms of order passed by this Court in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle (supra) and take appropriate decision thereon.

Sd/--/-----/-/----- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Praveen