Sonu Dewangan v. The State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 911 of 2020 • Sonu Dewangan S/o. Shri Shatrughan Dewangan Aged About 29 Years R/o. Village- Silhati, Police Station- Sahaspur Lohara, District- Kabeerdham, Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant
Versus
• The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station- Sahaspur Lohara, District- Kabeerdham, Chhattisgarh., ---- Respondent For Applicant : Shri Sunil Sahu, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Akhtar Hussain, PL Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Order On Board 12/03/2020 The applicant has filed this application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail as he is in custody in connection with Crime No. 06/2020 registered at police station Sahaspur Lohara, district Kasbirdham (CG) for the offence punishable under Section 34 (2) of the CG Excise Act.
As per prosecution case, on the basis of suspicion, the police party raided and seized 56 boxes containing 504 bulk liters of liquor from the vehicle being transported by the applicant for the Panchayat Election.
Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent
and a false seizure has been made. He submits that the applicant is in jail since 22.01.2020; charge sheet has been filed and the trial may take some time for its disposal and therefore he be released on bail by imposing appropriate condition.
On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application.
Heard counsel for the parties.
Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, in particular the detention period of the applicant and the fact that as per condition laid down in Section 59-A(ii) of the CG Excise Act 1915 and also the principles of law laid in Banti singh Vs. State of Chhattisgarh (MCRC No. 6846 of 2014), the applicant was found in possession of more than 504 bulk liters of illicit liquor which is more than the prescribed limit of 5 bulk liters, but looking to the fact that the applicant is in custody since 22.01.2020, case is triable by Judicial Magistrate First Class, the trial is likely to take some more time and also looking to the gravity of the offence, I am inclined to release him on regular bail. Accordingly, his application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is allowed.
It is directed that in the event of the applicant's furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 2,00,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned court for his appearance before it as and when directed, he shall be released on bail subject to the following conditions:
I) That the applicant shall furnish a specific undertaking that while on bail, he/she will not commit any excise offence, otherwise bail
granted to him/her shall be liable to be cancelled and shall co-operate the prosecution during trial.
ii) that the accused/applicant shall make himself/herself available for interrogation before the concerned Investigating Officer as and when required and the accused/applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. iii) That the accused/applicant shall not act, in any manner, which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial. Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) Judge suguna