The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. v. Savitri Bai And Others

.....

® ;

ff"THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CQ' LTD.

APP£LLANT Mfr Through Divisionaf Manager r apphcant NO ~ r v,» DMsionai Office in front of High (yourt w Bllaspur [C b J wtéga'é'

gch.

«bx;

g'""

S G\ {J0r-'3

VERSUS

V§F ONDENT 1, Savitri Bai W/O Purushottam Jahire .

, 'épHcam Aged abeut 27 years, /'Applicant -2 Ku. Roja Baby DIO Late Purshottam Jahire Aged about 4 u !

Applicant - 3 fr Ku Rubi DIO Late Purshotiam Jahire Aged about 2 years Respondent No. 2 8: 3 are miner Through their motherlSavitri Bai 3'

W/O Purushottam Jahjre a Aii Permanent Resident of Viii. BisanpUr, Tah. Baiodabazar, Distii R'aipur, [CG] Present Resident of Viiiage Sakreii, Tah.:- Sakti, Disti. Janjgir- Champa, CG "i§ion - Appiicant 4 iRajesh $ingh SIO Devcharan Ratre (/7, f x Aged About 27 years K, Devcharan S/ICiKaehtr _ thew (Non?

Appiicant -2 .> , {g t-,1 M S EMDRANDUM OF APPEAL U/ #{BAWST AWARD 5i ORDER DATED 1O 2002 DAS§ED BY THE ADS!

TIONAL MGTCR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL SAKTJC G [ON CLAIM NO var/0712001 A» X M ".mmwim a

NAR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR '> \ Misc. Appeai No.652 or 2003 k The Oriental Insurance Company Limited.

---- Appellant

Versus

!

Savitri Bai & Ors.

---- Respondents i : None present.

Fo§r appellant s t ,: None presen Fewesponde'nt '

Hon'ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Beip ai _ l '

rder On Board I O 2.12.2016 ven when the matter is called up for None for the appell an With this, th t'vrith no other option except to f dismissed the appeal for want otprosecution.w 3i The appeal is accordingly de Sci/- léhandra Bhushan Balpai) JUDGE