Mani Ram Verma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 886 of 2020 • Mani Ram Verma S/o Late Shri Feru Ram Verma Aged About 64 Years R/o Civil Line, Parsa Bhaderu Road, District Baloda Bazaar, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Agriculture And Sahakarita Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Director Agriculture And Sahakarita Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Raipur, Through Its Managing Director Chaubay Colony, G.E. Raod, Raipur Chhattisgarh.

4. Branch Manager Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Raipur, Chaubay Colony G.E. Road, Raipur Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Anadi Sharma, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Ishan Verma, Advocate For Respondents/ State :

Mr. Kapil Maini, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 11.02.2020

1. Primarily, the prayer would show that the relief in this petition is for payment of gratuity, if it is so the payment of gratuity are governed under the Gratuity Act wherein the petitioner can very well approach the competent controlling authority to redress his grievance. Since statutory alternative remedy is available, I am not inclined to entertain this petition.

2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to avail the alternative remedy available to him under the law.

Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge yasmin.am