Smt. Ansari Khatun v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 350 of 2018 Smt. Ansari Khatun W/o Mohd. Istak Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Gumga Post Dandgaon Police Station And Tahsil Udaipur District Surguja Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector, Surguja District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

3. The Sub Divisional Officer / Land Acquisition Officer Udaipur District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

4. The Tahsildar Udaipur Tahsil Udaipur District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

5. The Sub Divisional Officer (PWD) Udaipur District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. A. N. Pandey, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Mr. Shashank Thakur, Govt. Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 08/02/18 1.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner's land has been acquired by respondents No. 2 to 5 for construction of road in lieu of which no compensation has been paid to the petitioner, against which he has made representation before respondent authorities, but the same has not been considered and decided till date, hence this petition.

2.

Be that as it may, respondent No. 2 - Collector, Surguja is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner strictly in

accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The petitioner would also be at liberty to make additional representation before the respondent authorities, if any.

4.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition finally stands disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

SD/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka