← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/820/2019disposed off

Smt. Anita Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-02-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 820 of 2019 Smt. Anita Yadav W/o Shri Ram Bharos Yadav Aged About 33 Years R/o Shri Ram Krishna Aashram Bagicha, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Police Station New Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Commissioner Tribal Welfare, Raipur, Police Station Civil Lines, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh

3. Commissioner Tribal Welfare, Raipur, Police Station Civil Lines, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Shri Ram Krishna Aashram Through Its President, Pandrapath, Bagicha, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

5. The President Shri Ram Krishna Aashram Pandrapath, Bagicha, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Vaibhan A. Goverdhan, Advocate For State :

Mr. Sameer Behar, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 07/02/2019

1. The limited grievance which the petitioner has raised in the present writ petition is that the petitioner has been working with the respondents for over a decade and she should be considered for regularization in accordance with the circular of the State Government dated 05/03/08 and other circulars subsequently passed.

2. The Counsel for the petitioner submits that there are sanctioned vacant posts available in the department and there is also availability of work which stands established from the fact that

the petitioner has been working continuously for more than 10 years.

3. Given the aforesaid factual matrix, this Court does not intend to keep this writ petition pending, rather ends of justice would meet if the respondents 1 and 2 are directed to consider the claim of the petitioner for regularization, subject to their fulfilling other requisite eligibility criteria and having the minimum qualification prescribed under the rules and circulars governing the field, at the earliest preferably within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The petitioner, in addition, is also directed to file appropriate representation to respondents 1 and 2 again within a period of 3 weeks from today.

4. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit