← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/998/2021disposed off

Kapil Hansh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-03-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 998 of 2021 Kapil Hansh S/o Nandau, Aged About 38 Years, Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Government Middle School, Ghuichuwa, Block Pali, District Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Commissioner Cum Director, Directorate Of Panchayat , Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh

5. District Education Officer, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh

6. Block Education Officer, Pali, District Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For petitioner :

Shri Govind Dewangan, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. Vikas Shrivastava, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 09/03/2021

1. The limited grievance which the petitioner has raised in the present writ petition by virtue of order passed by this Court in the case of Mukesh Kumar Patel Vs. State of Chhattisgarh, WPS No. 2530/2017 decided on 26.11.2017 is for grant of the benefit of revised pay scale on completion of 8 years of service.

2. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance which now remains is that the benefit is being provided to the petitioner prospectively. Though the respondents have made a calculation which the petitioner was entitled for from the date of his completion of 8 years of service but no effective orders have been passed nor have the Department taken any step for releasing the arrears of payment. The petitioner prays for appropriate direction to the respondents for releasing the said amount.

3. Without entering into the merits of the case and taking into consideration the judgment of this Court in the case of Mukesh Patel (Supra) which has also been affirmed by the Division Bench and taking note of the fact that respondents have complied with the order to the extent of granting revised pay scale to the petitioner, let respondents 2 to 4 take an appropriate decision at the earliest so far as releasing of the arrears of payment which the petitioner is entitled for. Expecting a decision from the respondents within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the present writ petition stands disposed off.

Sd/- P. Sam Koshy JUDGE Khatai