← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRC/454/2016allowed

Sukhram v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-02-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No.

4 54 of 201 • Sukhram, son of Budhram Pal, aged about 80 years, resident of village-Khamtarai, Police Chowki-Kandarka, Police Station - Berla, District - Bemetara (C.G.) ---- Applicant

Versus

• State Of Chhattisgarh Through the Station House Officer, Police Station Berla, District-Bemetara (C.G.) ---- Respondent For Applicant:

Ms. Sharmila Singhai, Advocate.

For Respondent/State:

Mr. Neeraj Kumar Sharma, Dy. Govt.

Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board /0 2 /201 Heard.

(1) The accused/applicant has moved this bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for releasing him on regular bail during trial in connection with Crime No. 240/2015 registered at Police Station Berla, District Bemetara (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 20(b) of Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substance Act.

(2) Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the applicant planted Ganja in his field and on 29.10.2015, jurisdictional police visited agricultural field belonging to the applicant and seized 25 plants of Ganja allegedly planted by the applicant and also 36 small plants of Ganja planted by him and thereby committed the

aforesaid offences.

(3) Counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the offence in question as he has not committed any offence and all plants allegedly seized were the small plants and the land in which the ganja plants are said to have been planted belongs to one Goutam, S/o Devi Singh and the applicant is neither owner of the land in dispute nor he is possession holder of the said land. He further submits that applicant is in detention since 30.10.2015; and the charge sheet has already been filed and, therefore, the applicant may be released on bail.

(4) On the other hand, counsel for the State opposes the bail application.

(5) Taking into consideration the facts & circumstances of the case; and considering the dispute as to the title of the land in which ganja was allegedly planted; further considering his pre-trial detention; and the charge sheet has already been filed; this court is of the view that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the application is allowed. (6) Accused/applicant is directed to be released on bail on his executing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court. He is directed to appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to him by the said Court till disposal of the trial. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-