← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/367/2018dismissed

Shyam Kumar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-02-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 367 of 2018 Shyam Kumar S/o Shri Ratan Singh Chandra Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Satgarh Tahsil Malkharoda District Janjgir Champa Civil And Revenue District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector , Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

2. Sub Divisional Officer, (Revenue) Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

3. Tahsildar Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents WPC No. 36 Smt. Rukmani Patel, W/o Shri Maheshram Patel, aged about -40 years, R/o village-Ghanagar, Tah. & Distt. Raigarh, Civil and Revenue Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector , Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

2. Sub Divisional Officer, (Revenue) Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District: Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

3. Tahsildar Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner:

Mr. M.K. Sinha, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. Dilman Rati Minj, Dy. Govt. Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 2 6 /0 2 /201

(1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that impugned order passed by the Sub Divisional Officer is bad and unsustainable in law, which is liable to be set aside.

(2) At this stage, counsel for the State submits that revision is maintainable before the revisional authority under Section 50 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959 (for short ' Code, 1959') against the impugned order. (3) I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. (4) Since the order is revisable under Section 50 of the Code, 1959 before the revisional authority, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

(5) Accordingly the writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to proceed in accordance with law. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-