← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1307/2018disposed off

Ajit Nayak v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-07-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 1307 of 2018 Ajit Nayak, Aged About 46 Years, S/o late Shri Laxminath Nayak, Occupation Terminated from the post of Panchayat Secretary Of Village Panchayat Belgaol, Janpad Panchayat Koyailibeda Tahsil Pakhanjor, R/o Ward No.4, Pakhanjor, District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Mantralaya, Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. The Commissioner , Panchayat And Rural Development Department Indrawati Bhawan Naya Mantralaya Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. The Collector, District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

4. The Chief Executive Officer , Zila Panchayat Uttar Bastar Kanker , District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

5. The Chief Executive Officer , Janpad Panchayat Koyalibeda District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. J.N. Nande, Advocate For State/R.1,2,3 : Mr. Dhiraj Wankhede, Govt. Advocate For R.4&5 : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board 30.07.2018 Heard.

1.

The petitioner has preferred this writ petition seeking relief that the impugned order dated 17.01.2018 (Annexure P-1) issued by the Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Kanker may be quashed and all

consequential benefits be given to him.

2.

As per Annexure R-1 issued by Chief Education Officer, Jila Panchayat, Kanker, impugned order dated 17.01.2018 (Annexure P-1) has been cancelled reserving the right of the further inquiry as per law and the petitioner has posted at Gram Panchayat Belgaal, Janpad Panchayat, Koyalibeda.

3.

Counsel for the respondents No.4 & 5 submitted that they will give all consequential benefits to the petitioner as per law. 4.

In view of above submissions made by the counsel for the parties, nothing has remained for consideration in the present case. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) JUDGE L/-