← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1311/2018disposed off

Sahdeo v. South Eastern Coalfields Limited

2018-02-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1311 of 2018 Sahdeo S/o S/o Narayan, Aged About 59 Years R/o Ward No. 15, Heeragir Dafai, Haldibadi, Ncph Colliery, Chirimiri, P.O. Haldibadi, Tahsil Khadgawan, District Korea, Chhattisgarh, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. South Eastern Coalfields Limited Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director, Secl Head Quarters, Seepath Road, Bilaspur, Tahsil And Civil / Revenue District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director (Personnel) South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Secl Head Quarters, Seepath Road, Bilaspur, Tahsil And Civil / Revenue District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

3. Sub Area Manager, Ncph Sub Area Of The Chirmiri Area Of SECL, P.O. Haldi Bari, Tahsil Khadgawan, Civil And Revenue District Korea, Chhattisgarh, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents Shri Suryapratap Yuddhveer Singh, counsel for the petitioner/s. Shri Vikram Sharma, counsel for the respondents. Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 09/02/2018 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that identical writ petition has been disposed of by this Court in WPS No. 6916 of 2017 (Babu v. South Eastern Coal Fields Limited and Others) decided on 11.12.2017, in which this Court has directed as under :- "It goes without saying that the petitioner has any grievance against detailed charge-sheet, if any, issued in future, it will always be open for the petitioner to challenge the same in accordance with law. In that view of the matter, the petition is disposed off placing on record the statement of the respondent -SECL with the clear direction that if the respondent-SECL intend to proceed in departmental enquiry against the petitioner, then shall issue a proper charge-sheet along with

the list of document and witnesses."

2.

On the other hand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of SECL has no objection to the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.

With the consent of parties, the writ petition is disposed off in terms of order passed by this Court in Babu v. South Eastern Coalfields Limited (supra). No order as to cost (s).

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Deepti