Vijay v. South Eastern Doalfields Limited
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1309 of 2018 Vijay S/o Purnanand Aged About 59 Years R/o Ward No. 5 New Miner S Cheap House Pondi Chittajhor, West Chirimiri Tahsil Baikunthpur District Korea Chhattisgarh., District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. South Eastern Doalfields Limited Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director, S E C L Head Quarters Seepath Road, Bilaspur Tahsil And Civil / Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
2. Director ( Personnel ) South Eastern Coalfields Limited S E C L Head Quarters Seepath Road, Bilaspur Tahsil And Civil Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
3. Sub Area Manager, N C P H Sub Area Of The Chirimiri Area Of S E C L Post Office Haldi Bari Tahsil Khadgawan Civil And Revenue District Korea Chhattisgarh., District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents Shri Suryapratap Yuddhveer Singh, counsel for the petitioner/s. Shri Vikram Sharma, counsel for the respondents. Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 09/02/2018 1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that identical writ petition has been disposed of by this Court in WPS No. 6916 of 2017 (Babu v. South Eastern Coal Fields Limited and Others) decided on 11.12.2017, in which this Court has directed as under :- "It goes without saying that the petitioner has any grievance against detailed charge-sheet, if any, issued in future, it will always be open for the petitioner to challenge the same in accordance with law. In that view of the matter, the petition is disposed off placing on record the statement of the respondent -SECL with the clear direction that if the respondent-SECL intend to proceed in departmental enquiry against the petitioner, then shall issue a proper charge-sheet along with
the list of document and witnesses."
2.
On the other hand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of SECL has no objection to the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.
With the consent of parties, the writ petition is disposed off in terms of order passed by this Court in Babu v. South Eastern Coalfields Limited (supra). No order as to cost (s).
Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Deepti