Dhananjay Prasad Pandey v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.271 of 2016
1. Dhananjay Prasad Pandey, son of Shri Deenanath Pandey, aged about 36 years, Constable, R/o Mathpuraina Bajrang Chowk, Police Station Tikrapara, Raipur, Revenue, Civil & District Raipur.
2. Surendra Singh, son of Shri Amarpal Singh, aged about 45 years, Constable, R/o Police Line M.T.Pool, Police Station Kotwali Raipur, Revenue, Civil & District Raipur.
3. Rajesh Kumar Choudhari, son of Shri Chunbada Prasad Choudhary, aged about 36 years, Constable, R/o House No.38/1421 Old Police Line, Police Station Kotwali Raipur, Revenue, Civil & District Raipur.
4. Tarasingh, son of late Chetram, aged about 42 years, R/o.1294, M.D. Housing Board Colony Sector-8 Shaddu Police Station Mova, Raipur, Revenue, Civil & District Raipur.
5. Arun Kumar Verma, son of Shri Hirdey Verma, aged about 40 years, Constable, R/o M.D.301 Veersawarkar Nagar, Heerapur, Police Station Kabirnagar, Raipur, Revenue, Civil & District Raipur.
6. Yasin Khan, son of Shri Nawab Khan, aged about 32 years, Constable, Trade/Water Carrier, R/o Rajbandha Talab Paar Moudhapara, Police Station Moudhapara Raipur, Revenue, Civil & District Raipur.
---- Petitioners
Versus
1.
State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Home/Police Department, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur. 2.
Director General of Police, Police Headquarter, Naya Raipur, District Raipur.
3.
Additional Director General of Police, Chhattisgarh Police Force Headquarter, Naya Raipur, District Raipur. 4.
Inspector General of Police, Chhattisgarh Police Force-1, Police Headquarter, Naya Raipur, District Raipur. ---- Respondents
For Petitioners : Shri Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate.
For Respondents : Shri Dilman Rati Minj, Dy.G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 25/01/2016 (1) Heard.
(2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are working as Constable in the Department of Police, by the impugned order dated 18.01.2016 (Annexure P/11) passed by respondent No.2-Director General of Police, Raipur, the petitioners have been repatriated and therefore, they may be permitted to file representation before respondent No.2-Director General of Police, Raipur for redressal of their grievances and direction may be issued to decide the same expeditiously. (3) Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.
(4) The petitioners are permitted to file the representation before the respondent No.2-Director General of Police, Raipur. If such representation is made by the petitioners within ten days from today, respondent No.2 shall consider and decide the same on its own merit and in accordance with law preferably within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order along with representation of the petitioner.
(5) Till then, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioners with regard to the subject matter.
(6) With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-