Shesh Narayan Sharma v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.275 of 2016
1. Shesh Narayan Sharma S/o Rewati Raman Sharma, Aged About 49 Years Head Master Primary School, Kamalpur, Block Ramanuj Nagar Tehsil & District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh)
2. Bhagat Singh, S/o Govind Singh, Aged About 53 Years Head Master Primary School, Dev Nagar Block Ramanuj Nagar Tehsil & District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh)
3. Indra Pratap Singh, S/o Jagdish Prasad Singh, Aged About 48 Years Head Master Primary School Podi Block Ramanuj Nagar, Tehsil & District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh)
4. Amar Pratap Singh, S/o Late Sharda Sharan Singh, Aged About 50 Years Head Master Primary School Tejpur Block Ramanuj Nagar Tehsil & District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh)
5. Rupsai Porte, S/o. Alisai Porte, Aged About 52 Years Head Master Primary School Hanumangarh Block Ramanuj Nagar District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh)
6. Shiv Mangal Singh, S/o Shri Maansai, Aged About 50 Years Head Master Primary School Parsurampur Block Ramanuj Nagar District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh)
7. Gajadhar Singh Suryawanshi, S/o Shri Balram Singh, Aged About 49 Years Head Master Primary School Arjunpur Block Ramanuj Nagar District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Education Department Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
2. Director, Directorate Of Public Education, Raipur District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
3. District Education Officer, Surajpur, District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh)
4. Zila Panchayat, Through: Chief Executive Officer, Surajpur, District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioners :
Mr. Anup Majumdar, Advocate For Respondent-State :
Mr. Shangharsh Pandey, Dy. Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J.
Order on Board 24/08/2016 Heard.
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that case of the petitioners is similar to the case of one Smt. Usha Yadav and others v. State of Chhattisgarh and another, which was disposed off by this Court vide order dated 18/06/2015 in Writ Petition (S) No.1324 of 2009. 2.
It is for the petitioners to submit representations before the competent authority to raise such claim. If such claim is raised, the same shall be examined as to whether the case of the petitioners is similar to that of Smt. Usha Yadav (supra) or not and thereafter, decision shall be taken in accordance with law. 3.
With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands finally disposed off. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Tiwari