Jangbahadur Singh Chauhan v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 291 of 2016
1. Jangbahadur Singh Chauhan S/o R. P. S. Chauhan, Aged About 42 Years P.S. Gorakhpur Para, Block Gaurela, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)
2. Smt. Kamlesh Tiwari, W/o Kishore Kumar Tiwari, Aged About 55 Years Lecturer, Govt. Girls Middle School, Gaurela, District Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh)
3. Nagendramani Tripathi, S/o Rajmani Tripathi, Aged About 53 Years Lecturer Middle School, Amarkantak Road, Gaurela, District Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh)
4. Lakhan Lal Rajwade, S/o Shri Milau Ram Rajwade, Aged About 51 Years Lecturer, Middle School, Neori Navapara, Block Gaurela, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)
5. Siyaram Verma, S/o Shri Ramkhilawan, Aged About 52 Years Lecturer, Middle School, Sadhawani, Block Gaurela, District Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh)
6. Hari Prasad Kashyap, S/o Chhangu Ram Kashyap, Aged About 52 Years Lecturer, Middle School, Karangra, Block Gaurela, District Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh)
7. Gopal Prasad Kaushik, S/o Govind Kaushik, Aged About 50 Years Lecturer, Middle School, Girwar, Block Gaurela, District Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh)
8. Mangal Das Narange, S/o Shri B. R. Narange, Aged About 51 Years Lecturer, Middle School, Piparkhunti, Block Gaurela, District Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh)
9. Galiram Patel, S/o Shri Bhojram Patel, Aged About 61 Years Lecturer, Middle School Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara Tola, Block Gaurela, District Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh) 10.Vijay Kumar Tiwari, S/o Shri Dayashanker Tiwari, Aged About 52 Years Lecturer, Middle School, Dhanawali, Block Gaurela, District Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Education, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
2. District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh)
3. Block Education Officer, Gaurela, District Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh)
---- Respondents For Petitioners : Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondents/State:
Shri Om P. Sahu, Govt. Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 28/01/2016 Heard.
(1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have been promoted by order dated 02.12.2014 and they have joined where they have been promoted but no salary for the promoted post has been paid to them, though they are working on the promoted post, against which they made representation to the respondents authorities, but the same has not been decided till now and, therefore, they may be permitted to file fresh representation to the competent authority and the same may be directed to be decided within the specific time frame.
(2) Prayer appears to be fair & reasonable.
(3) Be that as it may, if the petitioners file fresh representations to the respondents authorities for redressal of their grievances within a period of two weeks from today, it is directed to be decided by the authority concerned expeditiously preferably within a period of 45 days from the receipt thereof.
(4) With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.
(5) It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the authority concerned are free to decide the representation of the petitioner on its own merit in accordance with law.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-