Chitranjan Prasad Kashyap v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.Cr.C.(A) No. 252 of 2019 Chitranjan Prasad Kashyap S/o Dhobilal Kashyap Aged About 32 Years Caste Kurmi, R/o Marghatti, Police Station Hasoud, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. ---- Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate, Janjgir District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent For the Applicant :

Shri G.V.K. Rao, Advocate.

For the Respondent/State :

Shri Arun Shukla, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant

ORDER

19.03.2019 1.

Heard on application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

2.

This is the second bail application of the applicant. The first bail application of the applicant was dismissed as withdrawn on 29.1.2019 in M.Cr.C.(A) No. 47 of 2019 and the applicant was directed to surrender before the concerned Court. The applicant is apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No. 145 of 2018, registered at Police Station Hasoud, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 474 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted by counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. No case is made out against the applicant on the basis of the material present in the case-diary. Hence, it is prayed that the applicant be enlarged on anticipatory bail. 4.

Learned State counsel opposes the bail application and the submissions made in this respect.

5.

Heard counsel for both the parties and perused the case diary. 6.

The allegation against the applicant is that he produced forged papers of qualification for obtaining job of Shiksha Karmi Grade-III. Hence, this case.

7.

Considering the evidence present against the applicant and also for the reason that the applicant has not complied with the direction given in the earlier order, I do not feel inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant. 8.

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application filed under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. is rejected.

Sd/- (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge Nimmi