← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1110/2021disposed off

Ajay Agrawal v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-03-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 1110 of 2021

1. Ajay Agrawal S/o Shri Shankarlal Agrawal, Aged About 33 Years Occupation Assistant Teacher L.B. Government Primary School Chattigirola, Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.,

2. Manoj Rai S/o Shri Babulal Rai Aged About 38 Years Occupation Assistant Teacher L.B. Government Primary School Lukapara, Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh

3. Ganesh Chouhan S/o Shri Panchram Chouhan, Aged About 38 Years Occupation Assistant Teacher L.B. Government Aadiwashi Kanya Aashram Saraipali, Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

4. Chandram Bhaskar S/o Shri Ramdayal Bhaskar Aged About 36 Years Occupation Assistant Teacher L.B. Government Primary School Bhikhapali, Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

5. Jagjiwan Ram Ratnakar S/o Shri Ramlal Ratnakar, Aged About 36 Years Occupation Assistant Teacher L.B. Government Primary School Noonpani, Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

6. Ramesh Kumar Paikra S/o Shri Sitaram Paikra, Aged About 44 Years Occupation Assistant Teacher L.B. Government Primary School Chhirrapali, Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Shiksha Vibhag, Mantralay Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh,

2. Secretary, Panchayat, Gramin Vikash Avm Shram Vibhag, Mantralay Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh,

3. District Education Officer, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

4. Mukhya Karyapalan Adhikari, Janpad Panchayat Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

5. Block Education Officer, Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh., ---Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Rajendra Kumar Patel, Advocate.

For State :

Shri Amit Buxy, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 18.03.2021 .

1. The limited grievance of the petitioners is that they are entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which they have completed but they have not been given the same till date.

-22. Given the limited grievance raised, let the petitioners make a detailed representation in this regard to respondents who in turn shall scrutinize the same and pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the field of Kramonnati. It is expected that an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioners.

3. With the aforesaid observation, writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Jyotijha