High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/434/2019disposed off

Ram Vishal @ Vishal Patel v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-02-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 434 of 2019

1. Ram Vishal @ Vishal Patel, S/o Late Dashrath Patel, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Village Nirtu Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

2. Balkumari, W/o Shri Narayan, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Village Nirtu, Police Station Koni, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collecto,r Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

3. Land Acquisition Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) of Sub Divisional Bilaspur, Head Office, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent WPC No. 435 of 2019 • Deep Kumar, S/o Shri Manglu Gond, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Golden Marvel Gali, Laxmi Nagar Prince Colony, Behind Shanti Atta Chakki Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector, Balodabazar-Bhatapara, District BalodabazarBhatapara, Chhattisgarh

3. Land Acquisition Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Of Sub Division Simga, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh

4. National Highway Authority of India Ltd., Through Project Director, Bilaspur Unit, Abhilasha Parisar, New Bus Stand, Bilaspur District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

---- Respondents WPC No. 442 of 2019

1. Surendra Kumar Garhewal, S/o Manharan Lal Garhewal, Aged About 36 Years

2. Sunil Kumar Garhewal, S/o Manharan Lal Garhewal, Aged About 38 Years

3. Anil Kumar Garhewal, S/o Manharan Lal Garhewal, Aged About 42 Years

4. Manish Kumar Garhewal, S/o Manharan Lal Garhewal, Aged About 33 Years All are R/o Village Nirtu, Tahsil Takhatpur, P.S. Koni, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

3. Land Acquisition Officer-cum Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Of Sub Division Bilaspur, Head Office, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners Shri Naveen Yadav, Advocate For Respondent-State Shri Sudeep Verma, Dy. GA For Respondent-NHAI Shri B. Gopa Kumar, Advocate Hon'ble Justice Mr. Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 13/02/2019 1.

In the present batch of petitions, it is contended that though the land of the petitioners was acquired and the compensation was paid, but the rehabilitation grant on the basis of the Notification

dated 04.01.2017, which was published in an extraordinary Gazette of Chhattisgarh, has not been given. It is further contended that the petitioners have made necessary representation to the concerned authorities, therefore, the authorities may be directed to decide the representation. 2.

Without entering into the merits of the case, considering the limited prayer, it is directed that if the petitioners make a fresh representation before the concerned Collector, the Collector may decide the same objectively within a period of 3 months. 3.

Accordingly, all the writ petitions are disposed of. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Nirala